Thursday, September 30, 2010

Introduction to Daniel Chapter 7

As we leave the first six chapters and enter chapter 7, we are leaving historical narrative behind and entering an apocalyptic section.

What is apocalyptic language?

Apocalyptic language is composed of symbols that are often lurid in color, violent in tone, and easily remembered. They strike the imagination and grab hold of the mind.

Such language is found in Revelation, Daniel, Ezekiel, Zechariah, Isaiah, and even in the gospels and epistles.

What is the purpose of apocalyptic language?

It denotes conflict and victory.

It is used when God judges and smites an oppressor and vindicates his people.

It is used to describe times of crisis and judgment.

Why does God use apocalyptic language?

Some think that the language is used to hide the true meaning from hostile authorities and thus shield God’s people from retaliation.

This makes more sense with the book of Revelation than it does with the book of Daniel. Who are the hostile authorities in Daniel? The Jews were not being persecuted. Further, writing the message in Hebrew would no doubt have been sufficient to hide its meaning from the Chaldeans and the Persians.

I think the reason God uses such language is because of its emotional impact.

Apocalyptic books are oil paintings from God.

The vivid and violent language conveys emotional images while also conveying historical facts – just as a painting can convey emotions and facts.

Numbers 12:8 reminds us that God does not always speak clearly, but sometimes uses dark language. (Such language may be reserved for times of conflict and judgment.)

How do we interpret apocalyptic language?

We need to pay particular attention to numbers and periods of time. They have symbolic meanings that must be deduced from the evidence.

3 is the number of God.

12 is the number of God’s people.

10 is the number of completeness.

7 is the number of perfection.

6 is the number of imperfection.

8 is the number of renewal.

Apocalyptic language always has historical significance, so we must study history in order to interpret it properly.

The usual approach to scripture is to understand a passage literally unless we are forced to do otherwise.

For example, Jesus told us to cut off our right hand if it offends us. Was this a literal command or should we interpret it figuratively?

This is reversed for apocalyptic language – it should be understand figuratively unless we are forced to do otherwise.

Whatever we do, we should strive to be consistent. (Hal Lindsey says the 144,000 Jews in Revelation 7:4 are literal yet the locusts in Revelation 9:3 are cobra helicopters. John Walvoord says the 10 days in Revelation 2:10 are figurative yet the 1000 years in Revelation 20 are literal.)

The following principles are helpful in interpreting apocalyptic language.

(1) We should understand apocalyptic language figuratively unless we are forced to do otherwise. We should be consistent in our interpretations.

(2) Similarity of language does not prove identity of subjects. (There are many judgments in the Bible, but the same language is used to describe each – Assyria, Babylon, Egypt, Edom. Jerusalem, Rome, the world.)

(3) Dissimilarity of language does not prove distinctness of subjects.

(4) Easy to understand scriptures should be used to understand harder passages. This basic principle of hermeneutics should be used whenever we study the Bible. We should be very wary of any interpretation of apocalyptic language that conflicts with easier passages found elsewhere. (Premillennialism is based entirely on Revelation 20 and as we know is in conflict with a host of other passages.)

(5) Mark Twain: “When you find yourselves on the side of the majority, it is probably time to change sides.” Keep in mind that more nonsense has been written about these books than any other Biblical subject. We must be discerning.

But shouldn’t we just take all scripture literally?

NO ONE takes all scripture literally.

Of course, when we say that we do not take all scripture literally we do not mean that we do not believe that all scripture is true. We know that God’s word is absolutely true and contains no falsehoods or inaccuracies – historical, scientific, or otherwise.

The question is not whether a particular passage is true, but is instead whether God is using literal language or figurative language to convey the truth to us.

To take Matthew 5:30 literally would require Christians to practice self-mutilation.

Is Genesis 3:15 a prophecy about snakes and humans or about God and Satan?

Was Hosea mistaken when he told Israel they were going into Egyptian captivity when they really went into Assyrian captivity – or did he simply know that to a Jew ‘Egypt’ denotes slavery and captivity?

To literally interpret Ezekiel 16:53–55 would require the resurrection of the Sodomites to their former prosperity despite what we read in Jude 7.

To literalize Ezekiel 37:22–25 would require David and not Jesus be Israel’s eternal king.

To literalize Isaiah 34:5–17 would require that Edom exist eternally here on earth and burn eternally while weeds and animals live in it.

NO ONE takes all scripture literally – indeed, it is not logically possible to do so. Instead we need to approach the scripture with the common sense that God has given to us and that he knew we had when he gave us his word. God wants a thinking people!

One last example: Matthew 24:21 and Ezekiel 5:9, in reference to different events, both claim that the event in question will be a greater calamity than anything that has occurred or will ever occur. Logically, this could not be literally true of both events! The solution is to recognize the language as hyperbole and reject the literal interpretation.

Sometimes one hears or reads Deuteronomy 29:29 applied to apocalyptic language.

The secret things belong to the Lord our God; but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.

The idea is that we shouldn’t worry about what books like Revelation and Daniel mean because they contain secret things that belong only to God. But does this make any sense?

The word apokalupsis in Greek means unveiled, uncovered, or revealed! Apocalyptic books do not contain secret things, they contain revealed things.

The Bible is meant to be understood – and if we don’t understand it, we shouldn’t blame our inability on God. He wants us to understand his word.

Apocalyptic language is meant to convey comfort to those suffering captivity or persecution. What would it say about God if he offered us comfort but worded it in such a way that we could never receive that comfort? He wants us to understand his word.

Final comments before we begin:

Many different interpretations about the following passages have been given. Without discussing all of the other opinions, I will largely confine my efforts to presenting and providing evidence for my own opinions.

While it is hard in some places to be dogmatic, it is not impossible. Also, our inability at some points to state with certainty what a passage means does not imply that it could mean anything. We can, even in those cases, still often state with certainty what the passage does not mean.

We all have preconceptions about what this book says or does not say. Countless sermons, for example, have used Daniel 12 to preach about the end of the world. We must, however, keep an open mind regarding the evidence in this book. Remember, however, Chesterton’s comment that an open mind is only useful when it clamps down on something solid.

Of course, it goes without saying that whatever is said about these passages should be checked carefully with the word.

In Mark 4 and Luke 8 we find two commands of Christ that have largely been ignored.

Mark 4:24 Take heed what you hear.

Luke 8:18 Take heed how you hear.

Hearing is not a neutral activity. Jesus told us to be active hearers and to watch both how and what we hear. (This is not directed just to our leaders, but it is directed to every Christian. This is a very important responsibility that we shouldn’t turn over to anyone else.)

This is particularly crucial today when so many are twisting the scriptures to their own and their listeners’ destruction.

Please visitThyWordIsTruth.comforfree audio lessons on Revelation, for aunique daily Bible reading calendar, to read aboutGod's plan of salvation, to read theanswers to hundreds of questions submitted by our readers, and for much, much more.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Daniel Chapter 6 Verses 25-27

25 Then King Darius wrote to all the peoples, nations, and languages that dwell in all the earth: “Peace be multiplied to you. 26 I make a decree, that in all my royal dominion men tremble and fear before the God of Daniel, for he is the living God, enduring for ever; his kingdom shall never be destroyed, and his dominion shall be to the end. 27 He delivers and rescues, he works signs and wonders in heaven and on earth, he who has saved Daniel from the power of the lions.”

Darius makes a public proclamation as Nebuchadnezzar had done in Daniel 3:29 and 4:34.

It was clear to all that God was alive and that he worked in history to bring about justice and the welfare of his people.

Indeed, while this was going on, his people were as promised returning to the Holy Land under Zerubbabel.

28 So this Daniel prospered during the reign of Darius and the reign of Cyrus the Persian.

Daniel’s usefulness to the king continued and he prospered as he had during the days of Nebuchadnezzar.

This verse does not imply that Cyrus followed Darius as some suggest that it does. Instead it states (correctly) that Darius and Cyrus ruled simultaneously.

He also continued to pray and study his Bible. The visions in Chapters 10–12 were given to him during the third year of Cyrus.

The book was probably written shortly after these visions were revealed, which perhaps puts its date around 532 (about 7 years after the Persians took over in 539).

Monday, September 20, 2010

Daniel Chapter 6 Verse 24

24 And the king commanded, and those men who had accused Daniel were brought and cast into the den of lions—they, their children, and their wives; and before they reached the bottom of the den the lions overpowered them and broke all their bones in pieces.

Without any trial or hearing, Darius has Daniel’s accusers and their families paraded past Daniel and thrown into the pit. They were killed before they reached the bottom of the pit. (These lions seem to have been in a foul mood for some reason. Perhaps because they had been forced to just stare at their dinner all night…)

And Daniel’s reaction? He did not object. God has said that he will judge – and we should not get in the way when he does!

What was their crime?

They had lied to the king.

They had tried to deprive the king of his most trusted advsior.

While Darius’ actions may seem arbitrary and unjust to us, we must keep in mind that ancient despots did not generally follow the law of Moses!

Deuteronomy 24:16 "The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, nor shall the children be put to death for the fathers; every man shall be put to death for his own sin.

Indeed, even the Jews did not always follow the law of Moses.

2 Kings 10:11 tells us that Jehu killed everyone in the house of Ahab in Jezreel.

Why were their families killed as well? Probably to minimize the chance of revenge. Darius wanted a secure prime minister.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Daniel Chapter 6 Verse 23

23 Then the king was exceedingly glad, and commanded that Daniel be taken up out of the den. So Daniel was taken up out of the den, and no kind of hurt was found upon him, because he had trusted in his God.

Darius brings Daniel out and looks him over. Not a scratch is found on him.

“And no hurt was found upon him…”

because Daniel was so powerful? No.

because Daniel was so charismatic? No.

because Daniel was so popular? No.

because Daniel was so wealthy? No.

because Daniel was so smart? No.

because Daniel trusted in God? Yes!

Daniel was delivered because Daniel was faithful to God. Indeed, he takes his place in the roll call of faith we find in Hebrews 11.

Hebrews 11:32-34 And what more shall I say? For time would fail me to tell of Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, of David and Samuel and the prophets – 33 who through faith conquered kingdoms, enforced justice, received promises, stopped the mouths of lions, 34 quenched raging fire, escaped the edge of the sword, won strength out of weakness, became mighty in war, put foreign armies to flight.

Daniel is a wonderful example of someone who absolutely refused to compromise with the world and instead remained loyal and true to God despite the earthly consequences.

Please visit ThyWordIsTruth.com for free audio lessons on Revelation, for a unique daily Bible reading calendar, to read about God's plan of salvation, to read the answers to hundreds of questions submitted by our readers, and for much, much more.

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Daniel Chapter 6 Verses 21-22

21 Then Daniel said to the king, “O king, live for ever! 22 My God sent his angel and shut the lions’ mouths, and they have not hurt me, because I was found blameless before him; and also before you, O king, I have done no wrong.”

Can you imagine the king’s relief when Daniel answered!

Daniel calls out and tells the king that God had sent an angel to shut the mouths of the lions. He also reminds the king that this was proof of his innocence.

But was he innocent? He had violated the law of the land. God, however, declared him innocent. God does not recognize as valid any law that contradicts his own. Every nation and king answers to God. He is the only supreme ruler.

These verses may give us a clue as to who the fourth person was with Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in the fiery furnace.

Recall Daniel 3:25.

Daniel 3:25 He answered, "But I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they are not hurt; and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods."

Here Daniel was delivered by an angel. This seems the most likely explanation for the deliverer in Chapter 3 as well.

Again, we should note that this was a miracle.

As I mentioned before, there are many who deny the miracles in the Bible and try to explain them away.

Their strained attempts to believe the Bible yet remove the miracles it contains would be laughable if they were not so sad.

Listen carefully to what John Crossan had to say about the resurrection of Lazarus in his book Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography.

…while I do not think this event ever did or could happen, I think it is absolutely true. Let me explan.

This quote is then followed by pages of mumbo-jumbo and double speak.

How would he respond to the following questions?

Do you believe that the resurrection of Lazarus is absolutely true? (He would say yes.)

Do you believe that the resurrection of Lazarus ever did or ever could happen? (He would say no.)

Keep this example in mind when you try to pin a liberal down about what he believes!! They are very skilled at using language intended to deceive.